Under the pseudonym of Niamh Byrne we find an old friend of this blog: Julia Ortega (Barcelona,
1971) strikes again! LGBT rights, social media, class difference, or sexism in
education are some of the current topics discussed. Please do not miss out.
SPANISH GAY FICTION: Why did you decide to publish Contigo hasta el infinito under a pen name?
JULIA ORTEGA: This is my first
novel set outside of Spain entirely. I use this pen name, which is of Irish
origin, from this very year on for all those novels that do NOT have Spain as
the main scenario.
SGF: On the dedication page you acknowledge all the people who work
continuously to make visible and legitimize LGBT relationships.
JO: LGBT community rights must
continue to be claimed today as much as when I started the novel. Back then I
was assigned this project—another challenge of mine—, and it finally has come
into existence. If I can make Frankie and Gigi win not only LGBT readers’
hearts but everybody’s, I will have achieved my goal.
SGF: Your book portrays a long-distance relationship built through
social media. What is your opinion about this new, increasingly more common way
of maintaining a love relationship?
JO: So-so. New technologies have
made the world smaller, and now people are closer—and more distant at the same
time! Let’s say that social networks help those facing actual problems to mix
with in their most immediate context. That is the case of Gigi, who was
pathologically shy during adolescence and would not in her wildest dreams have
dared to approach someone like Frankie. Personally, I think that social networks
remove these barriers and make communication easier between apparently incompatible
people.
SGF: Frankie believes that opposites attract. . .Do you think the same
way?
JO: No doubt. May that
relationship last or end over time, that is another story.
SGF: It is very curious that neither Frankie nor Gigi had lesbian
experiences before meeting again. Do you have knowledge of other similar
stories in real life?
JO: To me, Love has no gender.
This is not a question of being lesbian or heterosexual. In this case, we are dealing
with bisexuality instead of homosexuality. I do not mention it in the novel,
but I would say that Gigi had no kind of sexual experience until her
mid-twenties, when her relationship with Frankie begins. This is also quite
believable since she is more romantic and, as I said before, she finds harder
to mix with others.
SGF: When these class differences happen in a real-life couple, is it harder
for the low-class to adapt themselves to the environment of the high-class, or
vice versa?
JO: Everything depends on each
one’s intentions, their good will to solve certain conflicts. Although today’s
class difference is not as noticeable as in past centuries, it remains. The
problems are different, but the relationship still means a challenge for both
extremes.
SGF: Which one do you identify yourself with most: Frankie or Gigi?
JO: Both. I am much more
cynical than Gigi, and that makes me more similar to Frankie. Anyway, Gigi is a
dear, one of the few people who still believe in human kindness.
SGF: I remember that in the previous interview we talked about social tolerance
towards LGBT community, and you mentioned that there was so much hypocrisy
about it. Do you still feel the same?
JO: There is everything under
the sun. It may do not have to do with the topic
but the beholder. It seems as if only
a few people are able to talk about the subject discerningly (i.e., high-profile authors.) And what about us? We
cannot have knowledge, an opinion, and if we can, they do not read/listen to
us. That is the way it was years ago. Fortunately, things are changing and, yes, I have to thank the social media
phenomenon, you see?
SGF: Why did you choose Glasgow and Amsterdam as the settings of Contigo hasta el infinito?
JO: Back then I happened to see
both cities as opposing settings reflecting the mood of each of the protagonists
somehow. I am not sure but I guess that, as it took a long time to write the
novel, my feelings now the book is finished are therefore not the same than the
ones I had when I started it. This may be a clichéd view, but what story is not
at some point? By the way: unlike the plot of Caprichos del destino, there is nothing autobiographical in this
story.
SGF: When I stop to think of the easy-going relationship between Frankie
and her ex Dutch boyfriends, my conclusion is: “This would not have been possible
years ago.” Do you think that in our society, and especially among younger
generations, there is a much laxer view of sexuality?
JO: Much the same: it takes
all sorts to make a world. My book is not setting a precedent, seriously. If I
describe a very, very, very laid-back relationship among Frankie, Jan and
Björn, that is because I have seen similar things in some films, other novels,
or even people that I know or have known sometime in my life.
SGF: It seems that you are eluding the most melodramatic ways of romance
novels throughout the book. Was it a voluntary decision?
JO: That is because this is not a romance novel. This is a love story, but it deliberately departs
from all the (rigid) straits of the genre. I like love stories, but I dislike some—if
not all—of the (obligatory) patterns
so frequently found in bodice rippers.
It also has to do with extension; Contigo
hasta el infinito is a novella/novelette. I could not expand on certain aspects
which, furthermore, are not relevant and can distance the reader from the main theme:
the relationship between the two women.
SGF: Was anyone an inspiration for the arrogant Brianna MacFarland?
JO: There are so many Briannas
around the world, controlling people who want everybody to dance their tune only;
people who do not accept other alternative ways of living/loving/feeling. It is
not necessarily a question of money or power, though in Contigo hasta el infinito those elements are more recurrent. The
outstanding point is that Gigi eventually stands up to her mother and takes the
reins of her life. After all, we are not talking about teen love, but a
relationship between adults who know what they want.
I have not been inspired by
anybody in particular. If you want to put a face to Brianna, I myself visualize
Cate Blanchett.
SGF: When Karen learns that her daughter Frankie is a lesbian, her only
regret is that she would have liked to become a grandmother herself. The
MacFarlands also had other expectations for their daughter. Do you view parents
as generally thoughtless of their children’s own aspirations?
JO: Well, here we are back to
the topic of the hypocritical society to which you must please, no matter what;
always dictating the rules, imposing the standards; it states whom you have to
marry, how many children you need to have, their future occupations, and a long
et cetera. If someone defies the rules, he is pointed out and not for the good
precisely. In the long run, this causes unhappiness, and no parent wants it for
their children. “Behave well, and you will be happy and live quietly.” That is
the mantra. “Do not rebel, otherwise we all will suffer the consequences.” This
seems very much like the 19th century, but it unfortunately still
applies in some families, especially those (like Gigi’s) which, because of affluence
or social position, are in the public eye.
SGF: When will Frankie be totally honest with her mother and confess
that she is not a lawyer?
JO: We may never see that [Laughs.] Everyone can imagine a
continuation in their own way. The story is self-conclusive, so there is no
sequel. By the end, the two of them are living their relationship freely, and
that really is a happy ending in every sense.
SGF: You describe Ethan as someone who has not enjoyed too much family
love just because he is a man. Do you feel that those gender differences in
education still occur?
JO: Well, Ethan is a very
peculiar character that has not too much relevance because, as I said before, I
did not to want to mislead the readers from the pairing Frankie/Gigi. Does he
deserve his own novel? Maybe, but I have not considered this so far. I do not
rule it out, but it cannot be possible in the short run. And, yes: less and
less, but there are still certain differences between boys and girls in respect
to education. It has to do with society and parents—the main educators—as well.
SGF: Both the boisterous Hannah, Jan’s last fling, and the young
customers of the store where Frankie works are portrayed in a very sarcastic
way. At your age, is there something that you would like to preach them?
JO: Not at all. Youth has its
peculiarities, and maturity has its own. My descriptions are not intended to be
critical, only anecdotal and fun; just a reflection of the current society, but
with no condemning tone by a long shot. Hannah’s episode is one of the multiple
ways of introducing Jan. Sometimes anecdotes and experiences tell a lot about
their protagonists.
SGF: In Frankie’s mouth you put a wish that in the Obama era the film
industry will show more homosexual relationships and different types of families.
In hindsight, do you think that it happened like that?
JO: I cannot say for sure, but
if I were an American film producer and an African-American becomes the
President of the United States, I would know that I have to reflect it in some
way, as this is not just an ordinary
change. It represents an unprecedented historical and social milestone. That
must be explained, especially to the younger generations, in order to show them
that another freer world is possible. I saw The
Princess and the Frog[1]
and I loved to see an African-American protagonist in a Disney movie. And, like
Frankie, I bet that we will see a homosexual relationship in upcoming animated
films.[2]
But now we are in the time of Trump. . .
SGF: Can you tell something about your upcoming projects?
JO: OK, it will be a
psychological thriller set in USA and published under the pen name of Niamh
Byrne again. That is all I can tell.
[1] This Walt
Disney picture was released the very same year of the first inauguration of President
Obama: 2009.
[2] For instance, in 2012 we had the opportunity to see an
animated film with a gay (supporting) character on the big screen: Mitch—voiced
by Casey Affleck—in ParaNorman (Focus
Features-Laika Entertainment)